[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CALCETrU8mixFxpS2Bt2Q7S08zUFxZwE1zfqHw8PEetqewgR7RQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 26 Jun 2014 14:03:17 -0700
From: Andy Lutomirski <luto@...capital.net>
To: Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@...hat.com>
Cc: "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
kexec@...ts.infradead.org,
Michael Kerrisk-manpages <mtk.manpages@...il.com>,
"Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
Matthew Garrett <mjg59@...f.ucam.org>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <greg@...ah.com>,
Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>, dyoung@...hat.com,
chaowang@...hat.com, bhe@...hat.com,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Linux API <linux-api@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 08/15] kexec: New syscall kexec_file_load() declaration
On Thu, Jun 26, 2014 at 1:43 PM, Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@...hat.com> wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 26, 2014 at 04:33:37PM -0400, Vivek Goyal wrote:
>> This is the new syscall kexec_file_load() declaration/interface. I have
>> reserved the syscall number only for x86_64 so far. Other architectures
>> (including i386) can reserve syscall number when they enable the support
>> for this new syscall.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@...hat.com>
>> CC: linux-api@...r.kernel.org
>
> +.BR KEXEC_FILE_NO_INITRAMFS
> +Loading initrd/initramfs is optional. Specify this flag if no initramfs
> +is being loaded. If this flag is set, kernel will ignore the value passed
> +in
This seems pointless. Why not just pass -1 for initrd_fd to indicate
that no initrd is needed?
--Andy
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists