[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20140626035959.GE904@kroah.com>
Date: Wed, 25 Jun 2014 23:59:59 -0400
From: Greg KH <gregkh@...ux-foundation.org>
To: Josh Triplett <josh@...htriplett.org>
Cc: Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>, Andy Whitcroft <apw@...onical.com>,
akpm@...ux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] scripts/checkpatch.pl: Only emit LONG_LINE for --strict
On Wed, Jun 25, 2014 at 07:24:49PM -0700, Josh Triplett wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 25, 2014 at 05:05:07PM -0700, Joe Perches wrote:
> > On Wed, 2014-06-25 at 08:46 -0700, Josh Triplett wrote:
> > > Regardless of the long-standing debate over line width, checkpatch
> > > should not warn about it by default.
> >
> > I'm not getting involved here.
> >
> > I don't care much one way or another.
> >
> > I did submit a patch where I ignored 80
> > columns recently and I was told to try
> > again by the maintainer.
>
> I'm not asking you to get involved in the Great Line Length Debate;
> that's why I didn't attempt to patch CodingStyle or similar. However, I
> think it makes sense for *checkpatch* to stop emitting this warning.
>
> I'm hoping that Greg will chime in, as the maintainer of staging and the
> recipient of a huge number of checkpatch-motivated patches.
I have no problem with the existing checkpatch.pl tool and it calling
out 80 columns as a problem that needs to be fixed. So I don't like
this patch at all.
greg k-h
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists