[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAFo99gbp-CeoT-3rNkNJX1m79G+5zi7pJLjX9kYq=FEf1isn=g@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 26 Jun 2014 02:28:14 +0200
From: Rickard Strandqvist <rickard_strandqvist@...ctrumdigital.se>
To: Eddie Wai <eddie.wai@...adcom.com>
Cc: Maurizio Lombardi <mlombard@...hat.com>,
"James E.J. Bottomley" <JBottomley@...allels.com>,
linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] scsi: bnx2i: bnx2i_iscsi.c: Cleaning up variable is set
more than once
2014-06-25 19:13 GMT+02:00 Eddie Wai <eddie.wai@...adcom.com>:
> On Wed, 2014-06-25 at 16:26 +0200, Maurizio Lombardi wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> On 06/25/2014 04:04 PM, Rickard Strandqvist wrote:
>> > A struct member variable is set to different values without having used in between.
>> >
>> > This was found using a static code analysis program called cppcheck
>> >
>> > Signed-off-by: Rickard Strandqvist <rickard_strandqvist@...ctrumdigital.se>
>> > ---
>> > drivers/scsi/bnx2i/bnx2i_iscsi.c | 1 -
>> > 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-)
>> >
>> > diff --git a/drivers/scsi/bnx2i/bnx2i_iscsi.c b/drivers/scsi/bnx2i/bnx2i_iscsi.c
>> > index 166543f..fdf7bc3 100644
>> > --- a/drivers/scsi/bnx2i/bnx2i_iscsi.c
>> > +++ b/drivers/scsi/bnx2i/bnx2i_iscsi.c
>> > @@ -1643,7 +1643,6 @@ static void bnx2i_conn_get_stats(struct iscsi_cls_conn *cls_conn,
>> > stats->r2t_pdus = conn->r2t_pdus_cnt;
>> > stats->tmfcmd_pdus = conn->tmfcmd_pdus_cnt;
>> > stats->tmfrsp_pdus = conn->tmfrsp_pdus_cnt;
>> > - stats->custom_length = 3;
>> > strcpy(stats->custom[2].desc, "eh_abort_cnt");
>> > stats->custom[2].value = conn->eh_abort_cnt;
>> > stats->digest_err = 0;
>> >
>>
>> Eddie,
>>
>> The code modifies the content of stats->custom[2], so shouldn't custom_length be set to 3?
>> Why is it set to zero at the end of this function?
> Nice find. This is literally a day1 bug. Yes, I agree that the
> custom_length should be left at 3. Otherwise, the nlmsg replied back to
> the application would not have the custom message. Thanks.
>>
>> Regards,
>> Maurizio Lombardi
>
>
Hi, and thank you!
If it's not obvious, I do all my fixes without changing the previous
intent. But obviously it is not always right, rather it is one of main
reasons to fix this type of error :)
But I'll make a new patch then, with = 3 ?
Kind regards
Rickard Strandqvist
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists