[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1403763199.20275.39.camel@sauron.fi.intel.com>
Date: Thu, 26 Jun 2014 09:13:19 +0300
From: Artem Bityutskiy <dedekind1@...il.com>
To: Dave Chinner <david@...morbit.com>
Cc: Thomas Knauth <thomas.knauth@....de>,
David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>,
Maksym Planeta <mcsim.planeta@...il.com>,
Alexander Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] sysctl: Add a feature to drop caches selectively
On Thu, 2014-06-26 at 11:06 +1000, Dave Chinner wrote:
> Your particular use case can be handled by directing your benchmark
> at a filesystem mount point and unmounting the filesystem in between
> benchmark runs. There is no ned to adding kernel functionality for
> somethign that can be so easily acheived by other means, especially
> in benchmark environments where *everything* is tightly controlled.
If I was a benchmark writer, I would not be willing running it as root
to be able to mount/unmount, I would not be willing to require the
customer creating special dedicated partitions for the benchmark,
because this is too user-unfriendly. Or do I make incorrect assumptions?
Not that I need this syscall and trying to sell the idea to anyone, just
trying to understand the alternative you suggested.
--
Best Regards,
Artem Bityutskiy
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists