[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20140628174451.259859251@linuxfoundation.org>
Date: Sat, 28 Jun 2014 10:46:23 -0700
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
stable@...r.kernel.org, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...ux.intel.com>
Subject: [PATCH 3.4 32/43] x86-32, espfix: Remove filter for espfix32 due to race
3.4-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
------------------
From: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...ux.intel.com>
commit 246f2d2ee1d715e1077fc47d61c394569c8ee692 upstream.
It is not safe to use LAR to filter when to go down the espfix path,
because the LDT is per-process (rather than per-thread) and another
thread might change the descriptors behind our back. Fortunately it
is always *safe* (if a bit slow) to go down the espfix path, and a
32-bit LDT stack segment is extremely rare.
Signed-off-by: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@...ux.intel.com>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1398816946-3351-1-git-send-email-hpa@linux.intel.com
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
---
arch/x86/kernel/entry_32.S | 5 -----
1 file changed, 5 deletions(-)
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/entry_32.S
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/entry_32.S
@@ -550,11 +550,6 @@ ENTRY(iret_exc)
CFI_RESTORE_STATE
ldt_ss:
- larl PT_OLDSS(%esp), %eax
- jnz restore_nocheck
- testl $0x00400000, %eax # returning to 32bit stack?
- jnz restore_nocheck # allright, normal return
-
#ifdef CONFIG_PARAVIRT
/*
* The kernel can't run on a non-flat stack if paravirt mode
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists