linux-kernel - [PATCH 3.14 108/110] epoll: fix use-after-free in eventpoll_release

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20140628174551.799683600@linuxfoundation.org>
Date:	Sat, 28 Jun 2014 10:47:45 -0700
From:	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
	stable@...r.kernel.org, Konstantin Khlebnikov <koct9i@...il.com>,
	Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@...nvz.org>,
	Sasha Levin <sasha.levin@...cle.com>,
	Jason Baron <jbaron@...mai.com>,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: [PATCH 3.14 108/110] epoll: fix use-after-free in eventpoll_release_file

3.14-stable review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

------------------

From: Konstantin Khlebnikov <koct9i@...il.com>

commit ebe06187bf2aec10d537ce4595e416035367d703 upstream.

This fixes use-after-free of epi->fllink.next inside list loop macro.
This loop actually releases elements in the body.  The list is
rcu-protected but here we cannot hold rcu_read_lock because we need to
lock mutex inside.

The obvious solution is to use list_for_each_entry_safe().  RCU-ness
isn't essential because nobody can change this list under us, it's final
fput for this file.

The bug was introduced by ae10b2b4eb01 ("epoll: optimize EPOLL_CTL_DEL
using rcu")

Signed-off-by: Konstantin Khlebnikov <koct9i@...il.com>
Reported-by: Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@...nvz.org>
Cc: Sasha Levin <sasha.levin@...cle.com>
Cc: Jason Baron <jbaron@...mai.com>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>

---
 fs/eventpoll.c |    4 ++--
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

--- a/fs/eventpoll.c
+++ b/fs/eventpoll.c
@@ -910,7 +910,7 @@ static const struct file_operations even
 void eventpoll_release_file(struct file *file)
 {
 	struct eventpoll *ep;
-	struct epitem *epi;
+	struct epitem *epi, *next;
 
 	/*
 	 * We don't want to get "file->f_lock" because it is not
@@ -926,7 +926,7 @@ void eventpoll_release_file(struct file
 	 * Besides, ep_remove() acquires the lock, so we can't hold it here.
 	 */
 	mutex_lock(&epmutex);
-	list_for_each_entry_rcu(epi, &file->f_ep_links, fllink) {
+	list_for_each_entry_safe(epi, next, &file->f_ep_links, fllink) {
 		ep = epi->ep;
 		mutex_lock_nested(&ep->mtx, 0);
 		ep_remove(ep, epi);


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/