linux-kernel - [PATCH 3.10 16/77] mm/memory-failure.c: dont let collect_procs() skip over processes for MF_ACTION

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20140628174522.439522658@linuxfoundation.org>
Date:	Sat, 28 Jun 2014 10:46:09 -0700
From:	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
	stable@...r.kernel.org, Tony Luck <tony.luck@...el.com>,
	Naoya Horiguchi <n-horiguchi@...jp.nec.com>,
	Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>, Borislav Petkov <bp@...e.de>,
	Chen Gong <gong.chen@...ux.jf.intel.com>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: [PATCH 3.10 16/77] mm/memory-failure.c: dont let collect_procs() skip over processes for MF_ACTION_REQUIRED

3.10-stable review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

------------------

From: Tony Luck <tony.luck@...el.com>

commit 74614de17db6fb472370c426d4f934d8d616edf2 upstream.

When Linux sees an "action optional" machine check (where h/w has reported
an error that is not in the current execution path) we generally do not
want to signal a process, since most processes do not have a SIGBUS
handler - we'd just prematurely terminate the process for a problem that
they might never actually see.

task_early_kill() decides whether to consider a process - and it checks
whether this specific process has been marked for early signals with
"prctl", or if the system administrator has requested early signals for
all processes using /proc/sys/vm/memory_failure_early_kill.

But for MF_ACTION_REQUIRED case we must not defer.  The error is in the
execution path of the current thread so we must send the SIGBUS
immediatley.

Fix by passing a flag argument through collect_procs*() to
task_early_kill() so it knows whether we can defer or must take action.

Signed-off-by: Tony Luck <tony.luck@...el.com>
Signed-off-by: Naoya Horiguchi <n-horiguchi@...jp.nec.com>
Cc: Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>
Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@...e.de>
Cc: Chen Gong <gong.chen@...ux.jf.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>

---
 mm/memory-failure.c |   21 ++++++++++++---------
 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)

--- a/mm/memory-failure.c
+++ b/mm/memory-failure.c
@@ -382,10 +382,12 @@ static void kill_procs(struct list_head
 	}
 }
 
-static int task_early_kill(struct task_struct *tsk)
+static int task_early_kill(struct task_struct *tsk, int force_early)
 {
 	if (!tsk->mm)
 		return 0;
+	if (force_early)
+		return 1;
 	if (tsk->flags & PF_MCE_PROCESS)
 		return !!(tsk->flags & PF_MCE_EARLY);
 	return sysctl_memory_failure_early_kill;
@@ -395,7 +397,7 @@ static int task_early_kill(struct task_s
  * Collect processes when the error hit an anonymous page.
  */
 static void collect_procs_anon(struct page *page, struct list_head *to_kill,
-			      struct to_kill **tkc)
+			      struct to_kill **tkc, int force_early)
 {
 	struct vm_area_struct *vma;
 	struct task_struct *tsk;
@@ -411,7 +413,7 @@ static void collect_procs_anon(struct pa
 	for_each_process (tsk) {
 		struct anon_vma_chain *vmac;
 
-		if (!task_early_kill(tsk))
+		if (!task_early_kill(tsk, force_early))
 			continue;
 		anon_vma_interval_tree_foreach(vmac, &av->rb_root,
 					       pgoff, pgoff) {
@@ -430,7 +432,7 @@ static void collect_procs_anon(struct pa
  * Collect processes when the error hit a file mapped page.
  */
 static void collect_procs_file(struct page *page, struct list_head *to_kill,
-			      struct to_kill **tkc)
+			      struct to_kill **tkc, int force_early)
 {
 	struct vm_area_struct *vma;
 	struct task_struct *tsk;
@@ -441,7 +443,7 @@ static void collect_procs_file(struct pa
 	for_each_process(tsk) {
 		pgoff_t pgoff = page->index << (PAGE_CACHE_SHIFT - PAGE_SHIFT);
 
-		if (!task_early_kill(tsk))
+		if (!task_early_kill(tsk, force_early))
 			continue;
 
 		vma_interval_tree_foreach(vma, &mapping->i_mmap, pgoff,
@@ -467,7 +469,8 @@ static void collect_procs_file(struct pa
  * First preallocate one tokill structure outside the spin locks,
  * so that we can kill at least one process reasonably reliable.
  */
-static void collect_procs(struct page *page, struct list_head *tokill)
+static void collect_procs(struct page *page, struct list_head *tokill,
+				int force_early)
 {
 	struct to_kill *tk;
 
@@ -478,9 +481,9 @@ static void collect_procs(struct page *p
 	if (!tk)
 		return;
 	if (PageAnon(page))
-		collect_procs_anon(page, tokill, &tk);
+		collect_procs_anon(page, tokill, &tk, force_early);
 	else
-		collect_procs_file(page, tokill, &tk);
+		collect_procs_file(page, tokill, &tk, force_early);
 	kfree(tk);
 }
 
@@ -965,7 +968,7 @@ static int hwpoison_user_mappings(struct
 	 * there's nothing that can be done.
 	 */
 	if (kill)
-		collect_procs(ppage, &tokill);
+		collect_procs(ppage, &tokill, flags & MF_ACTION_REQUIRED);
 
 	ret = try_to_unmap(ppage, ttu);
 	if (ret != SWAP_SUCCESS)


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/