linux-kernel - Re: __schedule #DF splat

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20140629142722.GH18167@minantech.com>
Date:	Sun, 29 Jun 2014 17:27:22 +0300
From:	Gleb Natapov <gleb@...nel.org>
To:	Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
Cc:	Jan Kiszka <jan.kiszka@....de>,
	Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>,
	lkml <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
	Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>, x86-ml <x86@...nel.org>,
	kvm@...r.kernel.org, Jörg Rödel <joro@...tes.org>
Subject: Re: __schedule #DF splat

On Sun, Jun 29, 2014 at 04:01:04PM +0200, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> On Sun, Jun 29, 2014 at 04:42:47PM +0300, Gleb Natapov wrote:
> > Please do so and let us know.
> 
> Yep, just did. Reverting ae9fedc793 fixes the issue.
> 
> > reinj:1 means that previous injection failed due to another #PF that
> > happened during the event injection itself This may happen if GDT or fist
> > instruction of a fault handler is not mapped by shadow pages, but here
> > it says that the new page fault is at the same address as the previous
> > one as if GDT is or #PF handler is mapped there. Strange. Especially
> > since #DF is injected successfully, so GDT should be fine. May be wrong
> > cpl makes svm crazy?
> 
> Well, I'm not going to even pretend to know kvm to know *when* we're
> saving VMCB state but if we're saving the wrong CPL and then doing the
> pagetable walk, I can very well imagine if the walker gets confused. One
> possible issue could be U/S bit (bit 2) in the PTE bits which allows
> access to supervisor pages only when CPL < 3. I.e., CPL has effect on
> pagetable walk and a wrong CPL level could break it.
> 
> All a conjecture though...
> 
Looks plausible, still strange that second #PF is at the same address as the first one though.
Anyway, not we have the commit to blame.

--
			Gleb.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/