lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Sun, 29 Jun 2014 16:24:11 -0400
From:	Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
To:	Nick Krause <xerofoify@...il.com>
CC:	rth@...ddle.net, ink@...assic.park.msu.ru,
	Matt Turner <mattst88@...il.com>, linux-alpha@...r.kernel.org,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] FIXME of file toploogy.h for alpha cpus

On 06/28/2014 11:03 PM, Nick Krause wrote:
> I thought I compiled tested it maybe not. I thought M= would work for
> alpha directory but maybe I have to enable in on x86.
> I don't known if there is a way to do this.
> Cheers Nick
> 
> On Sat, Jun 28, 2014 at 3:53 PM, Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org> wrote:
>> On 06/28/2014 12:07 AM, Nicholas Krause wrote:
>>> This patch fixs the FIXME message in the function *cpumask_of_node
>>> for using this function multiple times and the issue with recaluting
>>> the cpu node mask when reusing this function.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Nicholas Krause <xerofoify@...il.com>
>>> ---
>>>  arch/alpha/include/asm/topology.h | 3 +++
>>>  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/arch/alpha/include/asm/topology.h b/arch/alpha/include/asm/topology.h
>>> index 9251e13..d301f66 100644
>>> --- a/arch/alpha/include/asm/topology.h
>>> +++ b/arch/alpha/include/asm/topology.h
>>> @@ -31,6 +31,9 @@ static const struct cpumask *cpumask_of_node(int node)
>>>       if (node == -1)
>>>               return cpu_all_mask;
>>>
>>> +     else if (node == &node_to_cpumask_map[node])
>>> +             return &node_to_cpumask_map[node];
>>> +
>>>       cpumask_clear(&node_to_cpumask_map[node]);
>>>
>>>       for_each_online_cpu(cpu) {
>>>
>>
>> Since this patch doesn't even compile, care to tell us how you tested it?
>>
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Sasha

Please stop top posting.

Your explanation is missing the part about actually making sure that your patch
works is missing, how did you intend to make sure that your patch doesn't
break things?


Thanks,
Sasha
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ