[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <53B07F99.40600@linicks.net>
Date: Sun, 29 Jun 2014 22:05:29 +0100
From: Nick Warne <nick@...icks.net>
To: Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
CC: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: 3.15.2 build error on AMD64
On 29/06/14 20:44, Borislav Petkov wrote:
>> This then is an old(er) version of GCC issue (but I dunno what).
>
> Right, so the error points at
>
> __spin_lock_mb_cache_entry(struct mb_cache_entry *ce)
> {
> spin_lock(bgl_lock_ptr(mb_cache_bg_lock, <---
> (hash_64((unsigned long)ce, __builtin_log2(8)))));
> }
>
> somewhere here and I'd guess that old gcc is issuing some lib function
> which uses SSE. And after we disabled all FPU stuff in the kernel with
> b399fe355b30 ("x86: Disable generation of traditional x87 instructions")
> that would issue such an error.
>
> And I was about to point at that __builtin_log2 thing which looked
> suspicious and found this by chance:
>
> http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1401471304-37479-1-git-send-email-tmac@hp.com
>
> You could test this patch with that old gcc 4.2.x as it looks like a
> good candidate for a fix for your issue.
Thanks Boris, but unfortunately I had to trash GCC 4.2.4 to build the
new 4.7.4 version - so I can't test the patch :(
At least this issue is now on record so others will not need to go to
penalties.
Many thanks,
Nick
--
"A bug in the code is worth two in the documentation."
FSF Associate Member 5508
http://linicks.net/
http://pi.linicks.net/
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists