[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <yq1fvin9uje.fsf@sermon.lab.mkp.net>
Date: Sun, 29 Jun 2014 19:15:49 -0400
From: "Martin K. Petersen" <martin.petersen@...cle.com>
To: Gu Zheng <guz.fnst@...fujitsu.com>
Cc: Jens <axboe@...nel.dk>, <martin.petersen@...cle.com>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Kent <kmo@...erainc.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] bio-integrity: add "bip_max_vcnt" into struct bio_integrity_payload
>>>>> "Gu" == Gu Zheng <guz.fnst@...fujitsu.com> writes:
[Sorry about the delay. I'm on vacation right now.]
Gu> But it seems that bip_integrity_vecs() will return the wrong number
Gu> if the bio is not based on any bio_set for some reason(bio->bi_pool
Gu> == NULL), because in that case, the bip_inline_vecs[0] is malloced
Gu> directly. So here we add the bip_max_vcnt to record the count of
Gu> vector slots, and cleanup the function bip_integrity_vecs().
I'm in agreement with your fix.
However, I'm still not sure what the use case is for bios without an
associated bioset. I do not see any callers that pass in a NULL bioset.
--
Martin K. Petersen Oracle Linux Engineering
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists