[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20140630101724.GB25779@arm.com>
Date: Mon, 30 Jun 2014 11:17:25 +0100
From: Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>
To: Rob Herring <robherring2@...il.com>
Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
Catalin Marinas <Catalin.Marinas@....com>,
Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>,
"devicetree@...r.kernel.org" <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
linaro-kernel <linaro-kernel@...ts.linaro.org>,
linux-pci <linux-pci@...r.kernel.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Grant Likely <grant.likely@...retlab.ca>,
Tanmay Inamdar <tinamdar@....com>,
Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>,
Jon Masters <jonathan@...masters.org>,
Liviu Dudau <Liviu.Dudau@....com>,
LAKML <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
Michal Simek <monstr@...str.eu>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 1/6] pci: Introduce pci_register_io_range() helper
function.
Hi Rob,
Nice work!
On Fri, Jun 27, 2014 at 05:15:53PM +0100, Rob Herring wrote:
> On 06/27/2014 07:49 AM, Will Deacon wrote:
> > On Fri, Jun 27, 2014 at 12:03:34PM +0100, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> >> On Thursday 26 June 2014 19:44:21 Rob Herring wrote:
> >>> I don't agree arm32 is harder than microblaze. Yes, converting ALL of
> >>> arm would be, but that is not necessary. With Liviu's latest branch
> >>> the hacks I previously needed are gone (thanks!), and this is all I
> >>> need to get Versatile PCI working (under QEMU):
> >>
> >> I meant converting all of arm32 would be harder, but I agree we don't
> >> have to do it. It would be nice to convert all of the drivers/pci/host
> >> drivers though, iow all multiplatform-enabled ones, and leaving the
> >> current arm32 pci implementation for the platforms we don't want to
> >> convert to multiplatform anyway (footbridge, iop, ixp4xx, ks8695 (?),
> >> pxa, sa1100).
> >
> > I'm more than happy to convert the generic host controller we merged
> > recently, but I'd probably want the core changes merged first so that I
> > know I'm not wasting my time!
>
> Something like this untested patch...
>
> Another issue I found still present is pci_ioremap_io needs some work
> to unify with the arm implementation. That's a matter of changing the
> function from an offset to i/o resource. That should be a pretty
> mechanical change.
>
> Also, there is a potential for memory leak because there is no undo
> for of_create_pci_host_bridge.
Once Liviu reposts his series, I'll take a look at
of_create_pci_host_bridge, as I'm not sure that it provides all the
behaviour that we get from gen_pci_parse_request_of_pci_ranges right now
(e.g. required a non-prefetchable mem resource).
Will
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists