linux-kernel - [PATCH 3.12 022/181] Btrfs: fix tracking of orphan inode count

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <f19eb84ed2054bf749e702251b40cbbc954b1077.1404128997.git.jslaby@suse.cz>
Date:	Mon, 30 Jun 2014 13:50:43 +0200
From:	Jiri Slaby <jslaby@...e.cz>
To:	stable@...r.kernel.org
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Filipe David Borba Manana <fdmanana@...il.com>,
	Josef Bacik <jbacik@...ionio.com>,
	Chris Mason <chris.mason@...ionio.com>,
	Jiri Slaby <jslaby@...e.cz>
Subject: [PATCH 3.12 022/181] Btrfs: fix tracking of orphan inode count

From: Filipe David Borba Manana <fdmanana@...il.com>

3.12-stable review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

===============

commit 703c88e035242202e3ab48fcbbbe0a7bc62fb7bb upstream.

In inode.c:btrfs_orphan_add() if we failed to insert the orphan
item, we would return without decrementing the orphan count that
we just incremented before attempting the insertion, leaving the
orphan inode count wrong.

In inode.c:btrfs_orphan_del(), we were decrementing the inode
orphan count if the bit BTRFS_INODE_ORPHAN_META_RESERVED was set,
which is logically wrong because it should be decremented if the
bit BTRFS_INODE_HAS_ORPHAN_ITEM was set - after all we increment
the count when we set the bit BTRFS_INODE_HAS_ORPHAN_ITEM elsewhere.

Signed-off-by: Filipe David Borba Manana <fdmanana@...il.com>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@...ionio.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@...ionio.com>
Signed-off-by: Jiri Slaby <jslaby@...e.cz>
---
 fs/btrfs/inode.c | 13 ++++++++-----
 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)

diff --git a/fs/btrfs/inode.c b/fs/btrfs/inode.c
index 3d03d2e0849c..250ed4ef6b91 100644
--- a/fs/btrfs/inode.c
+++ b/fs/btrfs/inode.c
@@ -2978,6 +2978,7 @@ int btrfs_orphan_add(struct btrfs_trans_handle *trans, struct inode *inode)
 	if (insert >= 1) {
 		ret = btrfs_insert_orphan_item(trans, root, btrfs_ino(inode));
 		if (ret) {
+			atomic_dec(&root->orphan_inodes);
 			if (reserve) {
 				clear_bit(BTRFS_INODE_ORPHAN_META_RESERVED,
 					  &BTRFS_I(inode)->runtime_flags);
@@ -3027,14 +3028,16 @@ static int btrfs_orphan_del(struct btrfs_trans_handle *trans,
 		release_rsv = 1;
 	spin_unlock(&root->orphan_lock);
 
-	if (trans && delete_item)
-		ret = btrfs_del_orphan_item(trans, root, btrfs_ino(inode));
-
-	if (release_rsv) {
-		btrfs_orphan_release_metadata(inode);
+	if (delete_item) {
 		atomic_dec(&root->orphan_inodes);
+		if (trans)
+			ret = btrfs_del_orphan_item(trans, root,
+						    btrfs_ino(inode));
 	}
 
+	if (release_rsv)
+		btrfs_orphan_release_metadata(inode);
+
 	return ret;
 }
 
-- 
2.0.0

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/