[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <3e500cc45f518651ca7ff2e91fece7ed1c039704.1404128998.git.jslaby@suse.cz>
Date: Mon, 30 Jun 2014 13:51:11 +0200
From: Jiri Slaby <jslaby@...e.cz>
To: stable@...r.kernel.org
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Naoya Horiguchi <n-horiguchi@...jp.nec.com>,
Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Jiri Slaby <jslaby@...e.cz>
Subject: [PATCH 3.12 050/181] mm: add !pte_present() check on existing hugetlb_entry callbacks
From: Naoya Horiguchi <n-horiguchi@...jp.nec.com>
3.12-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
===============
commit d4c54919ed86302094c0ca7d48a8cbd4ee753e92 upstream.
The age table walker doesn't check non-present hugetlb entry in common
path, so hugetlb_entry() callbacks must check it. The reason for this
behavior is that some callers want to handle it in its own way.
[ I think that reason is bogus, btw - it should just do what the regular
code does, which is to call the "pte_hole()" function for such hugetlb
entries - Linus]
However, some callers don't check it now, which causes unpredictable
result, for example when we have a race between migrating hugepage and
reading /proc/pid/numa_maps. This patch fixes it by adding !pte_present
checks on buggy callbacks.
This bug exists for years and got visible by introducing hugepage
migration.
ChangeLog v2:
- fix if condition (check !pte_present() instead of pte_present())
Reported-by: Sasha Levin <sasha.levin@...cle.com>
Signed-off-by: Naoya Horiguchi <n-horiguchi@...jp.nec.com>
Cc: Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>
Cc: <stable@...r.kernel.org> [3.12+]
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
[ Backported to 3.15. Signed-off-by: Josh Boyer <jwboyer@...oraproject.org> ]
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Jiri Slaby <jslaby@...e.cz>
---
fs/proc/task_mmu.c | 2 +-
mm/mempolicy.c | 6 +++++-
2 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/proc/task_mmu.c b/fs/proc/task_mmu.c
index 390bdab01c3c..ad4df869c907 100644
--- a/fs/proc/task_mmu.c
+++ b/fs/proc/task_mmu.c
@@ -1353,7 +1353,7 @@ static int gather_hugetbl_stats(pte_t *pte, unsigned long hmask,
struct numa_maps *md;
struct page *page;
- if (pte_none(*pte))
+ if (!pte_present(*pte))
return 0;
page = pte_page(*pte);
diff --git a/mm/mempolicy.c b/mm/mempolicy.c
index 927a69cf354a..a005cc9f6f18 100644
--- a/mm/mempolicy.c
+++ b/mm/mempolicy.c
@@ -525,9 +525,13 @@ static void queue_pages_hugetlb_pmd_range(struct vm_area_struct *vma,
#ifdef CONFIG_HUGETLB_PAGE
int nid;
struct page *page;
+ pte_t entry;
spin_lock(&vma->vm_mm->page_table_lock);
- page = pte_page(huge_ptep_get((pte_t *)pmd));
+ entry = huge_ptep_get((pte_t *)pmd);
+ if (!pte_present(entry))
+ goto unlock;
+ page = pte_page(entry);
nid = page_to_nid(page);
if (node_isset(nid, *nodes) == !!(flags & MPOL_MF_INVERT))
goto unlock;
--
2.0.0
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists