linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v3 09/13] memcg: apply walk_page

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Mon, 30 Jun 2014 15:20:16 +0300
From:	"Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill@...temov.name>
To:	Naoya Horiguchi <n-horiguchi@...jp.nec.com>
Cc:	linux-mm@...ck.org, Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...el.com>,
	Hugh Dickins <hughd@...gle.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Naoya Horiguchi <nao.horiguchi@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 09/13] memcg: apply walk_page_vma()

On Fri, Jun 20, 2014 at 04:11:35PM -0400, Naoya Horiguchi wrote:
> pagewalk.c can handle vma in itself, so we don't have to pass vma via
> walk->private. And both of mem_cgroup_count_precharge() and
> mem_cgroup_move_charge() walk over all vmas (not interested in outside vma,)
> so using walk_page_vma() is preferable.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Naoya Horiguchi <n-horiguchi@...jp.nec.com>

My first thought was to suggest walk_page_range(0, -1, &walk) instead
since we walk over all vmas. But walk_page_range() uses find_vma() on each
iteration, which is expensive.
Is there a reason why we cannot use vma->vm_next in walk_page_range()?

-- 
 Kirill A. Shutemov
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/