linux-kernel - [PATCH 3.12 049/181] nfsd: don't halt scanning the DRC LRU list when there's an RC

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <26e4087753f583b4b4db74937aa74beab09167dd.1404128998.git.jslaby@suse.cz>
Date:	Mon, 30 Jun 2014 13:51:10 +0200
From:	Jiri Slaby <jslaby@...e.cz>
To:	stable@...r.kernel.org
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Jeff Layton <jlayton@...marydata.com>,
	"J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@...hat.com>, Jiri Slaby <jslaby@...e.cz>
Subject: [PATCH 3.12 049/181] nfsd: don't halt scanning the DRC LRU list when there's an RC_INPROG entry

From: Jeff Layton <jlayton@...marydata.com>

3.12-stable review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

===============

commit 1b19453d1c6abcfa7c312ba6c9f11a277568fc94 upstream.

Currently, the DRC cache pruner will stop scanning the list when it
hits an entry that is RC_INPROG. It's possible however for a call to
take a *very* long time. In that case, we don't want it to block other
entries from being pruned if they are expired or we need to trim the
cache to get back under the limit.

Fix the DRC cache pruner to just ignore RC_INPROG entries.

Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@...marydata.com>
Signed-off-by: J. Bruce Fields <bfields@...hat.com>
Signed-off-by: Jiri Slaby <jslaby@...e.cz>
---
 fs/nfsd/nfscache.c | 17 ++++++++---------
 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)

diff --git a/fs/nfsd/nfscache.c b/fs/nfsd/nfscache.c
index f8f060ffbf4f..6040da8830ff 100644
--- a/fs/nfsd/nfscache.c
+++ b/fs/nfsd/nfscache.c
@@ -224,13 +224,6 @@ hash_refile(struct svc_cacherep *rp)
 	hlist_add_head(&rp->c_hash, cache_hash + hash_32(rp->c_xid, maskbits));
 }
 
-static inline bool
-nfsd_cache_entry_expired(struct svc_cacherep *rp)
-{
-	return rp->c_state != RC_INPROG &&
-	       time_after(jiffies, rp->c_timestamp + RC_EXPIRE);
-}
-
 /*
  * Walk the LRU list and prune off entries that are older than RC_EXPIRE.
  * Also prune the oldest ones when the total exceeds the max number of entries.
@@ -242,8 +235,14 @@ prune_cache_entries(void)
 	long freed = 0;
 
 	list_for_each_entry_safe(rp, tmp, &lru_head, c_lru) {
-		if (!nfsd_cache_entry_expired(rp) &&
-		    num_drc_entries <= max_drc_entries)
+		/*
+		 * Don't free entries attached to calls that are still
+		 * in-progress, but do keep scanning the list.
+		 */
+		if (rp->c_state == RC_INPROG)
+			continue;
+		if (num_drc_entries <= max_drc_entries &&
+		    time_before(jiffies, rp->c_timestamp + RC_EXPIRE))
 			break;
 		nfsd_reply_cache_free_locked(rp);
 		freed++;
-- 
2.0.0

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/