linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/1] drm/vmwgfx: correct fb_fix_screeninfo.line

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <53B16492.6040006@vmware.com>
Date:	Mon, 30 Jun 2014 15:22:26 +0200
From:	Thomas Hellstrom <thellstrom@...are.com>
To:	Christopher Friedt <chrisfriedt@...il.com>
CC:	dri-devel <dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Dave Airlie <airlied@...il.com>,
	linux-graphics-maintainer@...are.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] drm/vmwgfx: correct fb_fix_screeninfo.line_length

On 06/30/2014 03:18 PM, Christopher Friedt wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 30, 2014 at 8:49 AM, Christopher Friedt
> <chrisfriedt@...il.com> wrote:
>> That sounds a bit more accurate. Should kms and fbdev be setting both
>> registers then?
> I wonder if fbdev can use PITCHLOCK as well, rather than
> BYTES_PER_LINE. I will only be able to run both kms and fbdev
> functional tests about 9 hours from now, so any discussion until then
> is welcome

Please see the previous message I sent. If you just remove the line that
sets BYTES_PER_LINE,
fbdev will have called into the kms code to set PITCHLOCK correctly.

/Thomas
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/