[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <53B16B46.7060101@freescale.com>
Date: Mon, 30 Jun 2014 16:51:02 +0300
From: Horia Geantă <horia.geanta@...escale.com>
To: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...radead.org>
CC: <linux-doc@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] scripts/kernel-doc: handle object-like macros
On 6/29/2014 5:52 AM, Randy Dunlap wrote:
> On 06/23/14 05:15, Horia Geanta wrote:
>> Object-like macros are different than function-like macros:
>> https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/cpp/Object-like-Macros.html
>> https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/cpp/Function-like-Macros.html
>>
>> They are not parsed correctly, generating invalid intermediate
>> files (xmls) for cases like:
>> #define BIT_MASK (0xFF << BIT_SHIFT)
>> where "OxFF <<" is considered to be parameter type.
>>
>> When parsing, we can differentiate beween these two types of macros by
between.
>> checking whether there is at least one whitespace b/w "#define" and
>> first opening paranthesis.
>
> parenthesis.
Thanks, I'll fix both typos in v2.
>
> Where did you see a problem? I tested the patch and all of the
> Documentation/DocBook/*.xml files are the same without or with the patch.
>
Indeed, right now there is no kernel-doc for "object-like" macros in
Docbook.
I am preparing documentation for not-yet-upstreamed code in
drivers/crypto/caam and I thought it would be useful to use kernel-doc
for some of the #defines.
Doc would look like this (no @param list, no "Return" section, only a
description):
/**
* DEFAULT_SEC_ERA - the default value for the SEC era in case the user
* provides an unsupported value.
*/
#define DEFAULT_SEC_ERA 6
Regards,
Horia
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists