[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20140630162817.GS28951@arm.com>
Date: Mon, 30 Jun 2014 17:28:17 +0100
From: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>
To: Hanjun Guo <hanjun.guo@...aro.org>
Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>,
"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
"linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org" <linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>,
"rric@...nel.org" <rric@...nel.org>,
"grant.likely@...aro.org" <grant.likely@...aro.org>,
Sudeep Holla <Sudeep.Holla@....com>,
Mark Rutland <Mark.Rutland@....com>,
Charles Garcia-Tobin <Charles.Garcia-Tobin@....com>,
Lorenzo Pieralisi <Lorenzo.Pieralisi@....com>,
"linaro-acpi@...ts.linaro.org" <linaro-acpi@...ts.linaro.org>,
"graeme.gregory@...aro.org" <graeme.gregory@...aro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 07/13] ARM64 / ACPI: Introduce lowlevel suspend
function
On Fri, Jun 27, 2014 at 04:49:30AM +0100, Hanjun Guo wrote:
> From: Graeme Gregory <graeme.gregory@...aro.org>
>
> acpi_wakeup_address is used on x86 as the address bios jumps into
> when machine wakes up from suspend. As arm64 does not have such a
> bios this mechanism will be provided by other means. But the define
> is still required inside the acpi core.
Why not fix the place where it is used rather than defining a dummy
pointer?
> Introduce a null stub for acpi_suspend_lowlevel as this is also
> required by core. This will be filled in when standards are
> defined for arm64 ACPI global power states.
I assume acpi_suspend_lowlevel would be just a dummy definition but it
will have some use when the standard allows.
--
Catalin
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists