[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <53B1A62A.9070500@redhat.com>
Date: Mon, 30 Jun 2014 20:02:18 +0200
From: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>
To: Bandan Das <bsd@...hat.com>
CC: Nadav Amit <nadav.amit@...il.com>,
Nadav Amit <namit@...technion.ac.il>, gleb@...nel.org,
tglx@...utronix.de, mingo@...hat.com, x86@...nel.org,
kvm@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] KVM: x86: Fix lapic.c debug prints
Il 30/06/2014 19:39, Bandan Das ha scritto:
> Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com> writes:
>
>> Il 30/06/2014 03:03, Nadav Amit ha scritto:
>>>>>
>>>>> sipi_vector = apic->sipi_vector;
>>>>> - pr_debug("vcpu %d received sipi with vector # %x\n",
>>>>> + apic_debug("vcpu %d received sipi with vector # %x\n",
>>>>
>>>> Why don't we just use pr_debug all throughout ?
>>>>
>>> I don't know. I just tried to make it consistent, since it really bugged
>>> me while I was debugging the local-apic.
>>> If you prefer the other way around (which does seem to be better), I can
>>> do the search-and-replace.
>>
>> vcpu number probably could be moved inside apic_debug, at which point
>> apic_debug becomes preferrable.
>
> I am not sure, I think all that could be achieved with a file private
> debug define can be done with pr_debug which is generic.
> Nadav didn't introduce apic_debug to this file, so I am
> fine either way.
I am applying the patch, anything else can be done on top.
Paolo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists