[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1404155499-21177-1-git-send-email-linux@roeck-us.net>
Date: Mon, 30 Jun 2014 12:11:33 -0700
From: Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>
To: linux-watchdog@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Cc: Wim Van Sebroeck <wim@...ana.be>,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@...e-electrons.com>,
Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
Heiko Stuebner <heiko@...ech.de>,
Russell King <linux@....linux.org.uk>,
Jonas Jensen <jonas.jensen@...il.com>,
Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...radead.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>, linux-doc@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>
Subject: [RFC PATCH 0/6] kernel: Add support for restart notifier call chain
Various drivers implement architecture and/or device specific means
to restart (reset) the system. Various mechanisms have been implemented
to support those schemes. The best known mechanism is arm_pm_restart,
which is a function pointer to be set either from platform specific code
or from drivers. Another mechanism is to use hardware watchdogs to issue
a reset; this mechanism is used if there is no other method available
to reset a board or system. Two examples are alim7101_wdt, which currently
uses the reboot notifier to trigger a reset, and moxart_wdt, which registers
the arm_pm_restart function.
The existing mechanisms have a number of drawbacks. Typically only one scheme
to restart the system is supported (at least if arm_pm_restart is used).
At least in theory there can be mutliple means to restart the system, some of
which may be less desirable (for example one mechanism may only reset the CPU,
while another may reset the entire system). Using arm_pm_restart can also be
racy if the function pointer is set from a driver, as the driver may be in
the process of being unloaded when arm_pm_restart is called.
Using the reboot notifier is always racy, as it is unknown if and when
other functions using the reboot notifier have completed execution
by the time the watchdog fires.
To solve the problem, introduce a system restart notifier. This notifier
is expected to be called from the architecture specific machine_restart()
function. Drivers providing system restart functionality (such as the watchdog
drivers mentioned above) are expected to register with this notifier.
Patch 1 of this series implements the notifier function. Patches 2 and 3
implement calling the notifier chain from arm and arm64 restart code.
Patch 4 and 5 convert existing restart handlers in the watchdog subsystem
to use the restart notifier. Patch 6 unexports arm_pm_restart to ensure
that no one gets the idea to implement a restart handler as module.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists