linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 1/3] cgroup: fix mount failure in a corner case

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Mon, 30 Jun 2014 09:41:22 +0800
From:	Li Zefan <lizefan@...wei.com>
To:	Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
CC:	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Cgroups <cgroups@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/3] cgroup: fix mount failure in a corner case

On 2014/6/28 19:58, Tejun Heo wrote:
> Hello, Li.
> 
> On Fri, Jun 27, 2014 at 05:13:12PM +0800, Li Zefan wrote:
>> +	for_each_subsys(ss, i) {
>> +		if (!(opts.subsys_mask & (1 << i)) ||
>> +		    ss->root == &cgrp_dfl_root)
>> +			continue;
>> +
>> +		if (!percpu_ref_tryget_live(&ss->root->cgrp.self.refcnt)) {
>> +			mutex_unlock(&cgroup_mutex);
>> +			msleep(10);
>> +			ret = restart_syscall();
>> +			goto out_free;
>> +		}
> 
> Why not just put it immediately?  We know that it's not gonna be
> destroyed while holding cgroup_mutex.  It may look a bit weird but
> this is a pretty special case anyway and deferring put doesn't buy
> anything.
> 

Yeah, this is better. :)

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/