linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 2/2 v2] HID: leds: Use attribute-groups in MSI GT683R driver

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAK5ve-+-wkiG6n2Z5aPXQ7gYEDPwcAtPzjOLB+wyi+7h+8=8Hg@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Mon, 30 Jun 2014 16:17:10 -0700
From:	Bryan Wu <cooloney@...il.com>
To:	Jiri Kosina <jkosina@...e.cz>
Cc:	Johan Hovold <johan@...nel.org>,
	Janne Kanniainen <janne.kanniainen@...il.com>,
	Greg Kroah-Hartman <greg@...ah.com>,
	Bjørn Mork <bjorn@...k.no>,
	lkml <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Linux LED Subsystem <linux-leds@...r.kernel.org>,
	linux-usb@...r.kernel.org, linux-input@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2 v2] HID: leds: Use attribute-groups in MSI GT683R driver

On Mon, Jun 30, 2014 at 4:33 AM, Jiri Kosina <jkosina@...e.cz> wrote:
> On Mon, 30 Jun 2014, Johan Hovold wrote:
>
>> > I think the better place is HID/input tree, since this patch depends
>> > on the initial one which is not in my tree.
>> > I'm going to merge Johan's whole patchset and this patch probably
>> > depends Johan's work too.
>>
>> Dmitry has ACKed the input-patch and Bryan has applied that one and the
>> leds-patches to his tree (of which the first one is a dependency of this
>> patch).
>>
>> Jiri, are you saying that the gt683r-driver should go in through his
>> tree as well, that is all three patches including the first that you
>> have already applied? I just assumed your for-next branch was immutable,
>> but perhaps I was mistaken.
>
> Well, for-next branch is a collection of all the topic branches I am
> queuing for the following merge window.
>
> I am never really rebasing it, but I can definitely not include
> 'for-3.17/hid-gt683r' topic branch in the pile I will be sending to Linus
> (all the scheduled branches are getting merged into 'for-linus' only when
> merge window open). So the only potential conflict between hid.git and
> Bryan's tree would be in linux-next (and probably there will be none, git
> can handle duplicate patches nicely).
>
> So once Bryan confirms he's queued it (please preserve my Signoff from my
> tree), then I will just not include for-3.17/hid-gt683r branch in pull
> request to Linus and all is fine.
>

I'm OK to merge Janne's first patch for HID GT683R through my tree
with you guys' SOB.
I'm also OK to merge this incremental patchset here. Please confirm it
if I didn't misunderstand here.

Also Janne or someone, can you post the original first patch to me or
point me where is it?

Thanks,
-Bryan
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/