linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/4] fs.h: Remove unnecessary extern prototypes

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Mon, 30 Jun 2014 16:39:09 -0700
From:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
To:	Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>
Cc:	Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
	Jeff Layton <jlayton@...chiereds.net>,
	"J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@...ldses.org>,
	linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/4] fs.h: Remove unnecessary extern prototypes

On Mon, 30 Jun 2014 16:31:31 -0700 Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com> wrote:

> On Mon, 2014-06-30 at 16:19 -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > On Sat, 28 Jun 2014 17:20:13 -0700 Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com> wrote:
> > 
> > > This file has a mixture of prototypes with and without extern.
> > > Remove the extern uses.
> > 
> > urgh, it's been two days and this already throws a huge reject.  I fix
> > that and the other two patches throw great piles of rejects as well.
> > 
> > Dunno.  Maybe `diff -u1' will make it feasible.
> 
> This was against -next and was done almost completely
> by automated tool.

Ah, didn't know that.

I get the same issues with current -next.

> I can fix it and resubmit if you like.

OK.  How about we wait for -rc6 or thereabouts?  That should minimise
the pain profile.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/