[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20140630.234843.985671994258957329.davem@davemloft.net>
Date: Mon, 30 Jun 2014 23:48:43 -0700 (PDT)
From: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To: edward.allcutt@...nmarket.com
Cc: kuznet@....inr.ac.ru, jmorris@...ei.org, yoshfuji@...ux-ipv6.org,
kaber@...sh.net, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ipv4: icmp: Fix pMTU handling for rare case
From: Edward Allcutt <edward.allcutt@...nmarket.com>
Date: Mon, 30 Jun 2014 16:16:02 +0100
> This is explicitly described as an eventuality that hosts must deal
> with by the standard (RFC 1191) since older standards specified that
> those bits must be zero.
...
> One example I have seen is an OpenBSD router terminating IPSec
> tunnels.
Why doesn't OpenBSD implement RFC 1191?
That's a nearly 24 year old standard.
I really don't want to allow for zero values.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists