[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20140701122717.GN23300@sirena.org.uk>
Date: Tue, 1 Jul 2014 13:27:17 +0100
From: Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
To: Alexandre Courbot <gnurou@...il.com>
Cc: Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@....linux.org.uk>,
Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@...il.com>,
Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
linaro-kernel@...ts.linaro.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] regulator: core: Still free GPIOs using gpio_free()
On Tue, Jul 01, 2014 at 09:24:22PM +0900, Alexandre Courbot wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 1, 2014 at 9:11 PM, Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org> wrote:
> > Huh, good point (though it still seems a bit neater to match up the
> > request and release functions I guess). Linus?
> Yeah it's a nice habit to free the GPIOs using the same interface as
> the one used to obtain them. Although if we are to allow the regulator
> framework to request GPIO through both the integer and descriptor
> interfaces, we certainly don't want to track that information forever.
> On top of that we want to limit the use of gpio_to_desc() and
> desc_to_gpio() in drivers as much as possible, so I'd say I prefer to
> see gpiod_free() used no matter where the GPIO came from.
Right, but Linus said we didn't need this conversion to descriptors so
I'm a bit confused as to what the issue he was raising was.
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (820 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists