[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <53B2C419.4090706@windriver.com>
Date: Tue, 1 Jul 2014 09:22:17 -0500
From: Jason Wessel <jason.wessel@...driver.com>
To: Daniel Thompson <daniel.thompson@...aro.org>
CC: <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <patches@...aro.org>,
<linaro-kernel@...ts.linaro.org>, Mike Travis <travis@....com>,
Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...radead.org>,
Dimitri Sivanich <sivanich@....com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Borislav Petkov <bp@...e.de>,
<kgdb-bugreport@...ts.sourceforge.net>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] kgdb: Timeout if secondary CPUs ignore the roundup
On 07/01/2014 09:16 AM, Daniel Thompson wrote:
> Currently if an active CPU fails to respond to a roundup request the
> CPU that requested the roundup will become stuck. This needlessly
> reduces the robustness of the debugger.
>
> This patch introduces a timeout allowing the system state to be examined
> even when the system contains unresponsive processors. It also modifies
> kdb's cpu command to make it censor attempts to switch to unresponsive
> processors and to report their state as (D)ead.
It seems reasonable to allow entry on the master core because there certainly could be useful information to be had with respect to how you got there in the first place, but I wonder about the case for resuming the system. In general if you couldn't sync in the the first place, the system is dead. My opinion is that we probably should explicitly disallow a resume or single step at that point.
Jason.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists