linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v3 2/9] slab: move up code to get kmem_cache_node in free

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Tue, 1 Jul 2014 15:21:21 -0700 (PDT)
From:	David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>
To:	Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@....com>
cc:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Christoph Lameter <cl@...ux.com>,
	Pekka Enberg <penberg@...nel.org>, linux-mm@...ck.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Vladimir Davydov <vdavydov@...allels.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 2/9] slab: move up code to get kmem_cache_node in
 free_block()

On Tue, 1 Jul 2014, Joonsoo Kim wrote:

> node isn't changed, so we don't need to retreive this structure
> everytime we move the object. Maybe compiler do this optimization,
> but making it explicitly is better.
> 

Qualifying the pointer as const would be even more explicit.

> Acked-by: Christoph Lameter <cl@...ux.com>
> Signed-off-by: Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@....com>

Acked-by: David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/