[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20140701152716.b9b4b04ee67cf987844b1aa4@linux-foundation.org>
Date: Tue, 1 Jul 2014 15:27:16 -0700
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
To: Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>
Cc: linux-mm@...ck.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Andi Kleen <ak@...ux.intel.com>,
Naoya Horiguchi <n-horiguchi@...jp.nec.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] hwpoison: Fix race with changing page during offlining
v2
On Mon, 30 Jun 2014 17:32:16 -0700 Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org> wrote:
> From: Andi Kleen <ak@...ux.intel.com>
>
> When a hwpoison page is locked it could change state
> due to parallel modifications. Check after the lock
> if the page is still the same compound page.
>
> ...
>
> --- a/mm/memory-failure.c
> +++ b/mm/memory-failure.c
> @@ -1168,6 +1168,16 @@ int memory_failure(unsigned long pfn, int trapno, int flags)
> lock_page(hpage);
>
> /*
> + * The page could have changed compound pages during the locking.
> + * If this happens just bail out.
> + */
> + if (compound_head(p) != hpage) {
How can a 4k page change compound pages? The original compound page
was torn down and then this 4k page became part of a differently-sized
compound page?
> + action_result(pfn, "different compound page after locking", IGNORED);
> + res = -EBUSY;
> + goto out;
> + }
> +
> + /*
I don't get it. We just go and fail the poisoning attempt? Shouldn't
we go back, grab the new hpage and try again?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists