lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20140702070349.GA11943@gmail.com>
Date:	Wed, 2 Jul 2014 10:03:49 +0300
From:	Dan Aloni <dan@...nelim.com>
To:	Loic Prylli <loicp@...gle.com>
Cc:	netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Timo Teräs <timo.teras@....fi>,
	Jiri Pirko <jiri@...nulli.us>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] net: Fix NETDEV_CHANGE notifier usage causing spurious
 arp flush

On Tue, Jul 01, 2014 at 09:39:43PM -0700, Loic Prylli wrote:
> A bug was introduced in NETDEV_CHANGE notifier sequence causing the
> arp table to be sometimes spuriously cleared (including manual arp
> entries marked permanent), upon network link carrier changes.
> 
> The changed argument for the notifier was applied only to a single
> caller of NETDEV_CHANGE, missing among others netdev_state_change().
> So upon net_carrier events induced by the network, which are
> triggering a call to netdev_state_change(), arp_netdev_event() would
> decide whether to clear or not arp cache based on random/junk stack
> values (a kind of read buffer overflow).
[..]
>  {
>  	if (dev->flags & IFF_UP) {
> -		call_netdevice_notifiers(NETDEV_CHANGE, dev);
> +		struct netdev_notifier_change_info change_info;
> +
> +		change_info.flags_changed = 0;

I think it would be safer to do:

   struct netdev_notifier_change_info change_info = {};

So that when future fields are added to the struct and this call-site
happens to be forgotten, they will get 0 by default rather than
random stack values.

-- 
Dan Aloni
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ