[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20140702134853.43d624c9@bbrezillon>
Date: Wed, 2 Jul 2014 13:48:53 +0200
From: Boris BREZILLON <boris.brezillon@...e-electrons.com>
To: David Miller <davem@...hat.com>
Cc: nicolas.ferre@...el.com, plagnioj@...osoft.com,
alexandre.belloni@...e-electrons.com, linux@...im.org.za,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/2] ARM: at91: remove phy fixup for sama5d3xek
boards
Hello David,
On Tue, 01 Jul 2014 15:38:06 -0700 (PDT)
David Miller <davem@...hat.com> wrote:
> From: Boris BREZILLON <boris.brezillon@...e-electrons.com>
> Date: Thu, 26 Jun 2014 12:13:33 +0200
>
> > This patch removes a board specific hook for sama5d3xek boards from
> > the sama5d3 generic DT board file.
> >
> > This hook (which register a phy fixup configuring board specific
> > delays in the ksz9021 ethernet phy) is now replaced by the
> > appropriate DT properties definitions in the sama5d3xcm.dtsi file.
> >
> > Changes since v1:
> > - fix txc-skew-ps and rxc-skew-ps delays
> > - remove phy address info to handle Ronetix and Embest HW designs
>
> These patches do not apply cleanly to 'net' nor 'net-next', in fact
> you did not even say which tree these changes are targetting.
Actually, these patches were intended to be taken through at91 (and then
arm-soc) tree.
The reason I added netdev in Cc is because I wanted to get feedback on
the DT phy node definition (which I got from Florian).
I guess patch 2 does not apply cleanly because I based this work on top
of other changes which are not merged yet ([1]).
Nicolas, I'll take care to rebase this series on top of linus/master
branch (or whatever branch you want me to base it onto).
Thanks,
Boris
[1]http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/2014-June/265216.html
--
Boris Brezillon, Free Electrons
Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering
http://free-electrons.com
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists