linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/2] mfd: rtsx: add dma transfer function

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20140702121530.GF16724@lee--X1>
Date:	Wed, 2 Jul 2014 13:15:30 +0100
From:	Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>
To:	micky <micky_ching@...lsil.com.cn>
Cc:	Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@...aro.org>,
	Samuel Ortiz <sameo@...ux.intel.com>,
	Chris Ball <chris@...ntf.net>, devel@...uxdriverproject.org,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	linux-mmc <linux-mmc@...r.kernel.org>,
	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
	Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...cle.com>,
	Roger <rogerable@...ltek.com>, Wei WANG <wei_wang@...lsil.com.cn>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] mfd: rtsx: add dma transfer function

On Wed, 02 Jul 2014, micky wrote:

> On 06/18/2014 04:00 PM, Lee Jones wrote:
> >On Mon, 16 Jun 2014, Ulf Hansson wrote:
> >
> >>On 16 June 2014 14:20, Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org> wrote:
> >>>>From: Micky Ching <micky_ching@...lsil.com.cn>
> >>>>
> >>>>rtsx driver using a single function for transfer data, dma map/unmap are
> >>>>placed in one fix function. We need map/unmap dma in different place(for
> >>>>mmc async driver), so add three function for dma map, dma transfer and
> >>>>dma unmap.
> >>>>
> >>>>Signed-off-by: Micky Ching <micky_ching@...lsil.com.cn>
> >>>>---
> >>>>  drivers/mfd/rtsx_pcr.c       |   76 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++----------------
> >>>>  include/linux/mfd/rtsx_pci.h |    6 ++++
> >>>>  2 files changed, 54 insertions(+), 28 deletions(-)
> >>>I don't see any glaring issues with this patch.  Does it rely on the
> >>>first patch, or vise versa, or can it just be applied?
> >>The mmc part in patch2 relies on this one, but please go ahead and
> >>apply the mfd patch if you see it good.
> >>
> >>I can later provide my ack for the mmc parts, in patch2, when it's a
> >>reviewed properly and thus you can take it through your tree.
> >There's no rush.  Once you're happy with the MMC patch, Micky can
> >submit them both again with my Ack on the MFD part and I'll take them
> >as a set.
> >
> Hi Lee,
> 
> Can you pick this patch directly?  need resend it now?

No need to resend, I'll get round to applying it from here.

-- 
Lee Jones
Linaro STMicroelectronics Landing Team Lead
Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs
Follow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/