[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <7343032.WUqPgbXNQS@wuerfel>
Date: Wed, 02 Jul 2014 14:30:31 +0200
From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
To: linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Cc: Liviu Dudau <liviu@...au.co.uk>, Sinan Kaya <okaya@...eaurora.org>,
linaro-kernel <linaro-kernel@...ts.linaro.org>,
Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>,
Device Tree ML <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-pci <linux-pci@...r.kernel.org>,
Jingoo Han <jg1.han@...sung.com>,
Liviu Dudau <Liviu.Dudau@....com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Will Deacon <Will.Deacon@....com>,
Grant Likely <grant.likely@...retlab.ca>,
Kukjin Kim <kgene.kim@...sung.com>,
Tanmay Inamdar <tinamdar@....com>,
Suravee Suthikulanit <suravee.suthikulpanit@....com>,
Catalin Marinas <Catalin.Marinas@....com>,
Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 3/9] pci: Introduce pci_register_io_range() helper function.
On Tuesday 01 July 2014 21:45:09 Liviu Dudau wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 01, 2014 at 09:36:10PM +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> > On Tuesday 01 July 2014 19:43:28 Liviu Dudau wrote:
> >
> > This still conflicts with the other allocator you have in patch 9
> > for pci_remap_iospace: nothing guarantees that the mapping is the
> > same for both.
> >
> > Also, this is a completely pointless exercise at this moment, because
> > nobody cares about the result of pci_address_to_pio on architectures
> > that don't already provide this function. If we ever get a proper
> > Open Firmware implementation that wants to put hardcoded PCI devices
> > into DT, we can add an implementation, but for now this seems overkill.
> >
> > The allocator in pci_register_io_range seems reasonable, why not merge
> > this function with pci_remap_iospace() as I have asked you multiple
> > times before? Just make it return the io_offset so the caller can
> > put that into the PCI host resources.
>
> Hi Arnd,
>
> While I agree with you that at some moment the allocators were inconsistent
> wrt each other, for this version I would respectfully disagree on this.
> The allocator in pci_register_io_range() only makes sure that the ranges
> are not overlapping, it doesn't do any mapping whatsoever, while
> pci_remap_iospace() does only an ioremap_page_range(). The idea is that
> you get the offset out of pci_address_to_pio() and apply it to
> pci_remap_iospace().
Ok, got it now, I'm sorry I didn't read this properly at first.
Your solution looks correct to me, just using different
tradeoffs to what I was expecting: You get a working pci_address_to_pio()
function, which is probably never needed, but in turn you need to
keep the state of each host bridge in a global list.
Arnd
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists