linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 09/11] capsicum: implementations of new LSM hooks

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <1871630.hB3tXi0r3a@sifl>
Date:	Wed, 02 Jul 2014 09:49:24 -0400
From:	Paul Moore <paul@...l-moore.com>
To:	David Drysdale <drysdale@...gle.com>
Cc:	Andy Lutomirski <luto@...capital.net>,
	LSM List <linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
	Alexander Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
	Meredydd Luff <meredydd@...atehouse.org>,
	Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>,
	James Morris <james.l.morris@...cle.com>,
	Linux API <linux-api@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 09/11] capsicum: implementations of new LSM hooks

On Monday, June 30, 2014 09:05:38 AM Andy Lutomirski wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 30, 2014 at 3:28 AM, David Drysdale <drysdale@...gle.com> wrote:
> > If the LSM does not provide implementations of the .file_lookup and
> > .file_install LSM hooks, always use the Capsicum implementations.
> > 
> > The Capsicum implementation of file_lookup checks for a Capsicum
> > capability wrapper file and unwraps to if the appropriate rights
> > are available.
> > 
> > The Capsicum implementation of file_install checks whether the file
> > has restricted rights associated with it.  If it does, it is replaced
> > with a Capsicum capability wrapper file before installation into the
> > fdtable.
> 
> I think I fall on the "no LSM" side of the fence.  This kind of stuff
> should be available regardless of selected LSM (as it is in your
> code) ...

I agree.  Looking quickly at the patches, the code seems to take an odd 
approach of living largely outside the LSM framework, but then relying on a 
couple of LSM hooks.  Capsicum should either live fully as a LSM or fully 
outside of it, this mix seems a bit silly to me.

-- 
paul moore
www.paul-moore.com

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/