[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20140702142303.GJ2173@e106497-lin.cambridge.arm.com>
Date: Wed, 2 Jul 2014 15:23:03 +0100
From: Liviu Dudau <Liviu.Dudau@....com>
To: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
Cc: "linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
Liviu Dudau <liviu@...au.co.uk>,
Sinan Kaya <okaya@...eaurora.org>,
linaro-kernel <linaro-kernel@...ts.linaro.org>,
Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>,
Device Tree ML <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-pci <linux-pci@...r.kernel.org>,
Jingoo Han <jg1.han@...sung.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Will Deacon <Will.Deacon@....com>,
Grant Likely <grant.likely@...retlab.ca>,
Kukjin Kim <kgene.kim@...sung.com>,
Tanmay Inamdar <tinamdar@....com>,
Suravee Suthikulanit <suravee.suthikulpanit@....com>,
Catalin Marinas <Catalin.Marinas@....com>,
Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 3/9] pci: Introduce pci_register_io_range() helper
function.
On Wed, Jul 02, 2014 at 01:30:31PM +0100, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Tuesday 01 July 2014 21:45:09 Liviu Dudau wrote:
> > On Tue, Jul 01, 2014 at 09:36:10PM +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> > > On Tuesday 01 July 2014 19:43:28 Liviu Dudau wrote:
> > >
> > > This still conflicts with the other allocator you have in patch 9
> > > for pci_remap_iospace: nothing guarantees that the mapping is the
> > > same for both.
> > >
> > > Also, this is a completely pointless exercise at this moment, because
> > > nobody cares about the result of pci_address_to_pio on architectures
> > > that don't already provide this function. If we ever get a proper
> > > Open Firmware implementation that wants to put hardcoded PCI devices
> > > into DT, we can add an implementation, but for now this seems overkill.
> > >
> > > The allocator in pci_register_io_range seems reasonable, why not merge
> > > this function with pci_remap_iospace() as I have asked you multiple
> > > times before? Just make it return the io_offset so the caller can
> > > put that into the PCI host resources.
> >
> > Hi Arnd,
> >
> > While I agree with you that at some moment the allocators were inconsistent
> > wrt each other, for this version I would respectfully disagree on this.
> > The allocator in pci_register_io_range() only makes sure that the ranges
> > are not overlapping, it doesn't do any mapping whatsoever, while
> > pci_remap_iospace() does only an ioremap_page_range(). The idea is that
> > you get the offset out of pci_address_to_pio() and apply it to
> > pci_remap_iospace().
>
> Ok, got it now, I'm sorry I didn't read this properly at first.
>
> Your solution looks correct to me, just using different
> tradeoffs to what I was expecting: You get a working pci_address_to_pio()
> function, which is probably never needed, but in turn you need to
> keep the state of each host bridge in a global list.
Just a reminder that with my patchset I *do* start using pci_address_to_pio()
in order to correctly parse the IO ranges from DT.
Best regards,
Liviu
>
> Arnd
>
>
--
====================
| I would like to |
| fix the world, |
| but they're not |
| giving me the |
\ source code! /
---------------
¯\_(ツ)_/¯
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists