[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <9d7780c83db26683955cd01e6bc654ee2586e67f.1404315388.git.jbaron@akamai.com>
Date: Wed, 2 Jul 2014 15:52:44 +0000 (GMT)
From: Jason Baron <jbaron@...mai.com>
To: peterz@...radead.org, mingo@...nel.org
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, andi@...stfloor.org,
rostedt@...dmis.org
Subject: [PATCH 2/2] sched: fix static_key race with sched_feat
As pointed out by Andi Kleen, the usage of static keys can be racy in
sched_feat_disable() vs. sched_feat_enable(). Currently, we first check the
value of keys->enabled, and subsequently update the branch direction. This,
can be racy and can potentially leave the keys in an inconsistent state.
Take the i_mutex around these calls to resolve the race.
Reported-by: Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>
Signed-off-by: Jason Baron <jbaron@...mai.com>
---
kernel/sched/core.c | 5 +++++
1 file changed, 5 insertions(+)
diff --git a/kernel/sched/core.c b/kernel/sched/core.c
index 3bdf01b..249c865 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/core.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/core.c
@@ -243,6 +243,7 @@ sched_feat_write(struct file *filp, const char __user *ubuf,
char buf[64];
char *cmp;
int i;
+ struct inode *inode;
if (cnt > 63)
cnt = 63;
@@ -253,7 +254,11 @@ sched_feat_write(struct file *filp, const char __user *ubuf,
buf[cnt] = 0;
cmp = strstrip(buf);
+ /* Ensure the static_key remains in a consistent state */
+ inode = file_inode(filp);
+ mutex_lock(&inode->i_mutex);
i = sched_feat_set(cmp);
+ mutex_unlock(&inode->i_mutex);
if (i == __SCHED_FEAT_NR)
return -EINVAL;
--
1.8.2.rc2
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists