| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <20140702172355.GQ2173@e106497-lin.cambridge.arm.com>
Date: Wed, 2 Jul 2014 18:23:55 +0100
From: Liviu Dudau <Liviu.Dudau@....com>
To: Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>
Cc: linux-pci <linux-pci@...r.kernel.org>,
Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>,
Catalin Marinas <Catalin.Marinas@....com>,
Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
linaro-kernel <linaro-kernel@...ts.linaro.org>,
Tanmay Inamdar <tinamdar@....com>,
Grant Likely <grant.likely@...retlab.ca>,
Sinan Kaya <okaya@...eaurora.org>,
Jingoo Han <jg1.han@...sung.com>,
Kukjin Kim <kgene.kim@...sung.com>,
Suravee Suthikulanit <suravee.suthikulpanit@....com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Device Tree ML <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
LAKML <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 8/9] pci: Add support for creating a generic
host_bridge from device tree
On Wed, Jul 02, 2014 at 12:22:30PM +0100, Will Deacon wrote:
> Hi Liviu,
>
> On Tue, Jul 01, 2014 at 07:43:33PM +0100, Liviu Dudau wrote:
> > Several platforms use a rather generic version of parsing
> > the device tree to find the host bridge ranges. Move the common code
> > into the generic PCI code and use it to create a pci_host_bridge
> > structure that can be used by arch code.
> >
> > Based on early attempts by Andrew Murray to unify the code.
> > Used powerpc and microblaze PCI code as starting point.
>
> I just had a quick look at this to see how it differs from the parsing in
> pci-host-generic.c and there a few small differences worth discussing.
>
> > +static int pci_host_bridge_of_get_ranges(struct device_node *dev,
> > + struct list_head *resources, resource_size_t *io_base)
> > +{
> > + struct resource *res;
> > + struct of_pci_range range;
> > + struct of_pci_range_parser parser;
> > + int err;
> > +
> > + pr_info("PCI host bridge %s ranges:\n", dev->full_name);
> > +
> > + /* Check for ranges property */
> > + err = of_pci_range_parser_init(&parser, dev);
> > + if (err)
> > + return err;
> > +
> > + pr_debug("Parsing ranges property...\n");
> > + for_each_of_pci_range(&parser, &range) {
> > + /* Read next ranges element */
> > + pr_debug("pci_space: 0x%08x pci_addr:0x%016llx cpu_addr:0x%016llx size:0x%016llx\n",
> > + range.pci_space, range.pci_addr, range.cpu_addr, range.size);
> > +
> > + /*
> > + * If we failed translation or got a zero-sized region
> > + * then skip this range
> > + */
> > + if (range.cpu_addr == OF_BAD_ADDR || range.size == 0)
> > + continue;
> > +
> > + res = kzalloc(sizeof(struct resource), GFP_KERNEL);
> > + if (!res)
> > + return -ENOMEM;
> > +
> > + err = of_pci_range_to_resource(&range, dev, res);
> > + if (err)
> > + return err;
> > +
> > + if (resource_type(res) == IORESOURCE_IO)
> > + *io_base = range.cpu_addr;
> > +
> > + pci_add_resource_offset(resources, res,
> > + res->start - range.pci_addr);
>
> Where do you request_resource before adding it?
I don't, because I'm expecting that arch code might filter the list. When
the host bridge code calls pci_scan_root_bus() the resources will be
requested then.
>
> > + }
> > +
> > + /* Apply architecture specific fixups for the ranges */
> > + return pcibios_fixup_bridge_ranges(resources);
>
> I currently mandate at least one non-prefetchable resource in the
> device-tree. Should I simply drop this restriction, or do I have to somehow
> hook this into the pcibios callback?
Don't think I understand why you need at least one non-prefetcheable resource
but if you want to mandate that then the pcibios_fixup_bridge_ranges() would
be the place to put that check.
>
> > +}
> > +
> > +static atomic_t domain_nr = ATOMIC_INIT(-1);
> > +
> > +/**
> > + * of_create_pci_host_bridge - Create a PCI host bridge structure using
> > + * information passed in the DT.
> > + * @parent: device owning this host bridge
> > + * @ops: pci_ops associated with the host controller
> > + * @host_data: opaque data structure used by the host controller.
> > + *
> > + * returns a pointer to the newly created pci_host_bridge structure, or
> > + * NULL if the call failed.
> > + *
> > + * This function will try to obtain the host bridge domain number by
> > + * using of_alias_get_id() call with "pci-domain" as a stem. If that
> > + * fails, a local allocator will be used that will put each host bridge
> > + * in a new domain.
> > + */
> > +struct pci_host_bridge *
> > +of_create_pci_host_bridge(struct device *parent, struct pci_ops *ops, void *host_data)
> > +{
> > + int err, domain, busno;
> > + struct resource *bus_range;
> > + struct pci_bus *root_bus;
> > + struct pci_host_bridge *bridge;
> > + resource_size_t io_base;
> > + LIST_HEAD(res);
> > +
> > + bus_range = kzalloc(sizeof(*bus_range), GFP_KERNEL);
> > + if (!bus_range)
> > + return ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM);
> > +
> > + domain = of_alias_get_id(parent->of_node, "pci-domain");
> > + if (domain == -ENODEV)
> > + domain = atomic_inc_return(&domain_nr);
> > +
> > + err = of_pci_parse_bus_range(parent->of_node, bus_range);
> > + if (err) {
> > + dev_info(parent, "No bus range for %s, using default [0-255]\n",
> > + parent->of_node->full_name);
> > + bus_range->start = 0;
> > + bus_range->end = 255;
> > + bus_range->flags = IORESOURCE_BUS;
>
> What about bus_range->name?
Don't know! Is anyone using it?
>
> > + }
> > + busno = bus_range->start;
> > + pci_add_resource(&res, bus_range);
>
> I currently truncate the bus range to fit inside the Configuration Space
> window I have (in the reg property). How can I continue to do that with this
> patch?
Not easily. Unless I add an argument to this function that will allow you to
pass in the max number for the bus range, then the code becomes:
+ err = of_pci_parse_bus_range(parent->of_node, bus_range);
+ if (err) {
+ dev_info(parent, "No bus range for %s, using default [0-%d]\n",
+ parent->of_node->full_name, max_range);
+ bus_range->start = 0;
+ bus_range->end = max_range;
+ bus_range->flags = IORESOURCE_BUS;
+ } else {
+ if (bus_range->end > bus_range->start + max_range) {
+ bus_range->end = bus_range->start + max_range;
+ }
+ }
Or something like that.
Best regards,
Liviu
>
> Will
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-pci" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
>
--
====================
| I would like to |
| fix the world, |
| but they're not |
| giving me the |
\ source code! /
---------------
¯\_(ツ)_/¯
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists