linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 1/3] ima: use ahash API for file hash calculation

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Wed, 02 Jul 2014 11:52:53 -0700
From:	Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...el.com>
To:	Dmitry Kasatkin <dmitry.kasatkin@...il.com>
CC:	Mimi Zohar <zohar@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	linux-ima-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net,
	linux-security-module <linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	linux-crypto <linux-crypto@...r.kernel.org>,
	Dmitry Kasatkin <d.kasatkin@...sung.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/3] ima: use ahash API for file hash calculation

On 07/02/2014 11:40 AM, Dmitry Kasatkin wrote:
>> > We should reserve command-line parameters for things that really need
>> > tweaking in early boot or are _needed_ to boot.
...
> Is module param good enough or it should be sysctl?

Doesn't matter to me much.  sysctls seem to be the easiest things to
configure and make persistent.  I'm not sure if the normal
/etc/modprobe.d things work for built-in features, but if they do I'd
say a modparam is fine.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/