linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 0/7] [RESEND][v4] x86: rework tlb range flushing code

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <1404327890.13372.4.camel@buesod1.americas.hpqcorp.net>
Date:	Wed, 02 Jul 2014 12:04:50 -0700
From:	Davidlohr Bueso <davidlohr@...com>
To:	Dave Hansen <dave@...1.net>
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org, hpa@...or.com,
	mingo@...hat.com, tglx@...utronix.de, x86@...nel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/7] [RESEND][v4] x86: rework tlb range flushing code

On Tue, 2014-07-01 at 09:48 -0700, Dave Hansen wrote:
> x86 Maintainers,
> 
> Could this get picked up in to the x86 tree, please?  That way,
> it will get plenty of time to bake before the 3.17 merge window.

I had originally tried out this series (~v1, v2 iirc) on large KVM
configurations. Setting the TLB flush tunable to 33 seemed prudent and
didn't cause anything weird. Feel free to add my:

Tested-by: Davidlohr Bueso <davidlohr@...com>

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/