[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CACoXjcn5wdOwQx6PSfhTyuo-FQqBL62o-MNj3i6EfENRnUNt6g@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 2 Jul 2014 13:43:41 -0700
From: Tanmay Inamdar <tinamdar@....com>
To: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
Cc: Liviu Dudau <Liviu.Dudau@....com>,
linux-pci <linux-pci@...r.kernel.org>,
Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>,
Catalin Marinas <Catalin.Marinas@....com>,
Will Deacon <Will.Deacon@....com>,
Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>,
linaro-kernel <linaro-kernel@...ts.linaro.org>,
Grant Likely <grant.likely@...retlab.ca>,
Sinan Kaya <okaya@...eaurora.org>,
Jingoo Han <jg1.han@...sung.com>,
Kukjin Kim <kgene.kim@...sung.com>,
Suravee Suthikulanit <suravee.suthikulpanit@....com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Device Tree ML <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
LAKML <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
patches <patches@....com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 2/9] pci: Export find_pci_host_bridge() function.
On Wed, Jul 2, 2014 at 12:12 PM, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de> wrote:
> On Wednesday 02 July 2014 11:06:38 Tanmay Inamdar wrote:
>> On Tue, Jul 1, 2014 at 11:43 AM, Liviu Dudau <Liviu.Dudau@....com> wrote:
>> > This is a useful function and we should make it visible outside the
>> > generic PCI code. Export it as a GPL symbol.
>> >
>> > Signed-off-by: Liviu Dudau <Liviu.Dudau@....com>
>> > Tested-by: Tanmay Inamdar <tinamdar@....com>
>> > ---
>> > drivers/pci/host-bridge.c | 3 ++-
>> > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>> >
>> > diff --git a/drivers/pci/host-bridge.c b/drivers/pci/host-bridge.c
>> > index 0e5f3c9..36c669e 100644
>> > --- a/drivers/pci/host-bridge.c
>> > +++ b/drivers/pci/host-bridge.c
>> > @@ -16,12 +16,13 @@ static struct pci_bus *find_pci_root_bus(struct pci_bus *bus)
>> > return bus;
>> > }
>> >
>> > -static struct pci_host_bridge *find_pci_host_bridge(struct pci_bus *bus)
>> > +struct pci_host_bridge *find_pci_host_bridge(struct pci_bus *bus)
>> > {
>> > struct pci_bus *root_bus = find_pci_root_bus(bus);
>> >
>> > return to_pci_host_bridge(root_bus->bridge);
>> > }
>> > +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(find_pci_host_bridge);
>>
>> Is there any specific reason behind making this symbol GPL? I think
>> the other functions in this file are just EXPORT_SYMBOL. Ultimately
>> companies which have non gpl Linux modules (nvidia) will face issue
>> using this API.
>>
>> The same applies to 'of_create_pci_host_bridge'.
>
> I think EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL() is better here. The new symbols are unlikely
> to be used by a peripheral device driver, and PCI host controllers are
> already restricted by EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL.
>
You are right as long as the functions are not used directly. But what
if GPL functions are called indirectly. For example, 'pci_domain_nr'
implementation in Liviu's V7 series calls 'find_pci_host_bridge'.
> nvidia will certainly not do a PCI host controller driver that is not
> upstream or not GPL-compatible.
>
> Arnd
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists