[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1404341317.1862.71.camel@ul30vt.home>
Date: Wed, 02 Jul 2014 16:48:37 -0600
From: Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@...hat.com>
To: Mike Christie <michaelc@...wisc.edu>
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, stable@...r.kernel.org,
Sagi Grimberg <sagig@...lanox.com>,
Nicholas Bellinger <nab@...ux-iscsi.org>,
SCSI Mailing List <linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3.15 099/139] libiscsi, iser: Adjust data_length to
include protection information
On Wed, 2014-07-02 at 17:44 -0500, Mike Christie wrote:
> On 07/02/2014 05:15 PM, Alex Williamson wrote:
> > On Sat, 2014-06-28 at 10:47 -0700, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> >> > 3.15-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
> >> >
> >> > ------------------
> >> >
> >> > From: Sagi Grimberg <sagig@...lanox.com>
> >> >
> >> > commit d77e65350f2d82dfa0557707d505711f5a43c8fd upstream.
> >> >
> >> > In case protection information exists over the wire
> >> > iscsi header data length is required to include it.
> >> > Use protection information aware scsi helpers to set
> >> > the correct transfer length.
> >> >
> >> > In order to avoid breakage, remove iser transfer length
> >> > checks for each task as they are not always true and
> >> > somewhat redundant anyway.
> >> >
> >> > Signed-off-by: Sagi Grimberg <sagig@...lanox.com>
> >> > Reviewed-by: Mike Christie <michaelc@...wisc.edu>
> >> > Acked-by: Mike Christie <michaelc@...wisc.edu>
> >> > Signed-off-by: Nicholas Bellinger <nab@...ux-iscsi.org>
> >> > Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
> >> >
> >> > ---
> >> > drivers/infiniband/ulp/iser/iser_initiator.c | 34 +++++++--------------------
> >> > drivers/scsi/libiscsi.c | 18 +++++++-------
> >> > 2 files changed, 19 insertions(+), 33 deletions(-)
> > I'm a bit late to object, but this is causing a regression for me on
> > 3.15.3 and 3.16-rc. Using an iscsi_tcp rootfs, I'm seeing the NULL
>
>
> A fix for this is in Christoph's tree. Here is the status of the patch.
>
> http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=140432482527273&w=2
Thanks for the pointer. It's curious why there was no objection to this
going into stable if it's been known to be broken for a week.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists