[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20140701225420.6cc94fb5.akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Date: Tue, 1 Jul 2014 22:54:20 -0700
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
To: Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@...nel.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-f2fs-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [PATCH] f2fs: check bdi->dirty_exceeded when trying to skip
data writes
On Sat, 28 Jun 2014 20:58:38 +0900 Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@...nel.org> wrote:
> If we don't check the current backing device status, balance_dirty_pages can
> fall into infinite pausing routine.
>
> This can be occurred when a lot of directories make a small number of dirty
> dentry pages including files.
>
> ...
>
> --- a/fs/f2fs/node.c
> +++ b/fs/f2fs/node.c
> @@ -43,6 +43,8 @@ bool available_free_memory(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi, int type)
> mem_size = (nm_i->nat_cnt * sizeof(struct nat_entry)) >> 12;
> res = mem_size < ((val.totalram * nm_i->ram_thresh / 100) >> 2);
> } else if (type == DIRTY_DENTS) {
> + if (sbi->sb->s_bdi->dirty_exceeded)
> + return false;
> mem_size = get_pages(sbi, F2FS_DIRTY_DENTS);
> res = mem_size < ((val.totalram * nm_i->ram_thresh / 100) >> 1);
> }
err, filesystems should not be playing around with this.
Perhaps VFS changes are needed. Please tell us much much more about
what is going on here.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists