[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <53B5DBB9.3080202@cogentembedded.com>
Date: Fri, 04 Jul 2014 02:39:53 +0400
From: Sergei Shtylyov <sergei.shtylyov@...entembedded.com>
To: Vivek Gautam <gautam.vivek@...sung.com>
CC: Julius Werner <jwerner@...omium.org>,
"linux-usb@...r.kernel.org" <linux-usb@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-samsung-soc@...r.kernel.org"
<linux-samsung-soc@...r.kernel.org>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
kishon <kishon@...com>, Mathias Nyman <mathias.nyman@...el.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
Kukjin Kim <kgene.kim@...sung.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/4] usb: host: xhci-plat: Add support to get PHYs
Hello.
On 06/25/2014 12:44 PM, Vivek Gautam wrote:
>>>> diff --git a/drivers/usb/host/xhci.h b/drivers/usb/host/xhci.h
>>>> index 9ffecd5..453d89e 100644
>>>> --- a/drivers/usb/host/xhci.h
>>>> +++ b/drivers/usb/host/xhci.h
>>>> @@ -1582,6 +1582,9 @@ struct xhci_hcd {
>>>> u32 port_status_u0;
>>>> /* Compliance Mode Timer Triggered every 2 seconds */
>>>> #define COMP_MODE_RCVRY_MSECS 2000
>>>> + /* phys for the controller */
>>>> + struct phy *phy2_gen;
>>>> + struct phy *phy3_gen;
>>>> };
>>> I don't think adding new variables here and restricting most of this
>>> logic to xhci-plat.c (in the next patch) is the best way to do it.
>> Indeed.
Actually, I haven't given enough thought to this...
>>> There's no conceptual reason why other host controllers (e.g. xhci-pci
>>> or even EHCI) could not have a similar need to tune their PHY after
>>> reset. PHYs are universal to all host controllers.
>>> There is already a 'phy' member in struct usb_hcd which I think is
>>> mostly unused right now. I think it would be much less
>>> confusing/redundant to reuse that member for this purpose (you could
>>> still set it up from xhci_plat_probe(), and then call it from
>>> hcd_bus_resume() or something like that).
>> That member has type 'struct usb_phy *' while here we have 'struct phy *'
>> -- feel the difference.
>> I have already tried adding 'struct phy *gen_phy' to 'struct usb_hcd',
> So the 'struct phy *' available in the usb_hcd is requested in usb_add_hcd().
> This is requested with the constant string 'usb' :
> struct phy *phy = phy_get(hcd->self.controller, "usb");
> This can get the phy with string 'usb' only if, either the host
> controller has a device node wherein the phys are given.
Yes, that was the plan. Currently, the PHY driver for which this was
written can be probed from the device tree only.
> Even in this case one can't give same constant string for two
> different phys, UTMI+ and PIPE3 phy, isn't it ?
Yes, you're right. I didn't really consider the case of some host needing
2 distinct PHY.
> Or, the other way can be when host gets a lookup table to look into to
> find the relevant phys, something like
> Heikki has suggested:
> usb: dwc3: host: convey the PHYs to xhci
> (https://lkml.org/lkml/2014/6/5/585) and related patch series.
Well, AFAIK the look-up table method is already provided by the current
PHY core for non-DT use cases; this doesn't seem to have changed with that
patch set, does it?
> So if we use this second approach, we would need to override the
> 'phy_get()' that has been done in usb_add_hcd()
> in xhci_plat_probe(), and then use them in later operations.
I guess it'd probably be simpler to ignore the 'gen_phy' member of 'struct
usb_hcd' in your case (if it gets eventually added).
WBR, Sergei
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists