[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAFp+6iFyO=B6sgH91gGZOKUpJqoqnA4bnbOtgZgZnmWbHBF+Gw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 3 Jul 2014 10:29:00 +0530
From: Vivek Gautam <gautam.vivek@...sung.com>
To: Kishon Vijay Abraham I <kishon@...com>
Cc: Heikki Krogerus <heikki.krogerus@...ux.intel.com>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Felipe Balbi <balbi@...com>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux USB Mailing List <linux-usb@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCHv2 0/6] phy: simplified phy lookup
Hi,
On Wed, Jul 2, 2014 at 5:01 PM, Kishon Vijay Abraham I <kishon@...com> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Thursday 05 June 2014 06:51 PM, Vivek Gautam wrote:
>> Hi Heikki,
>>
>>
>> On Thu, Jun 5, 2014 at 6:22 PM, Heikki Krogerus
>> <heikki.krogerus@...ux.intel.com> wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> So the idea with these is that they should help to make it possible to
>>> request phys without caring about how they are mapped to the
>>> consumers, meaning, was is the mapping done in DT, ACPI, etc. Mapping
>>> phys to consumers can be now done with lookups similarly how clocks
>>> can be mapped in clkdev.c.
>>>
>>> Vivek needs to handle the phys of dwc3 also in xhci driver on
>>> Exynos5420 SoC, so I'm resending these now.
>>
>> Thank you so much for your efforts.
>> This will greatly help me in preparing the patches for PHY tuning.
>
> Can I get Tested-by please?
Sure,
I have tested this series with my phy-calibration patches. [1]
The entire lookup method looks fine.
Although i am re-working on my patches, but for this series -
Tested-by: Vivek Gautam <gautam.vivek@...sung.com>
[1] https://lkml.org/lkml/2014/6/6/202
--
Best Regards
Vivek Gautam
Samsung R&D Institute, Bangalore
India
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists