linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH V4 03/16] perf, x86: use context switch callback to flush LBR stack

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <53B4EDD0.8080003@intel.com>
Date:	Thu, 03 Jul 2014 13:44:48 +0800
From:	"Yan, Zheng" <zheng.z.yan@...el.com>
To:	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
CC:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, mingo@...nel.org, acme@...radead.org,
	eranian@...gle.com, andi@...stfloor.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH V4 03/16] perf, x86: use context switch callback to flush
 LBR stack

On 07/02/2014 05:06 PM, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 30, 2014 at 04:50:40PM +0800, Yan, Zheng wrote:
>> @@ -185,6 +185,23 @@ void intel_pmu_lbr_enable(struct perf_event *event)
>>  		return;
>>  
>>  	/*
>> +	 * It is necessary to flush the stack on context switch. This happens
>> +	 * when the branch stack does not tag its entries with the pid of the
>> +	 * current task.
> 
> Did you mean to say: "This happens _because_ the branch stack does not
> tag its entries with the pid of the current task." ?

yes. The comment is copied from comments of perf_branch_stack_sched_in()

Regards
Yan, Zheng

> 
>> +	 */
>> +	if (sched_in) {
>> +		intel_pmu_lbr_reset();
>> +		cpuc->lbr_context = ctx;
>> +	}
>> +}

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/