[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAK=WgbZL9XbMtHpsQz8zuo5mbqSUnQhtjDoWPi2M2mfVxjaFNw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 3 Jul 2014 10:25:01 +0300
From: Ohad Ben-Cohen <ohad@...ery.com>
To: Suman Anna <s-anna@...com>
Cc: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
Kumar Gala <galak@...eaurora.org>,
Tony Lindgren <tony@...mide.com>,
Josh Cartwright <joshc@...eaurora.org>,
Bjorn Andersson <bjorn@...o.se>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-omap@...r.kernel.org" <linux-omap@...r.kernel.org>,
"devicetree@...r.kernel.org" <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-arm <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCHv5 05/15] hwspinlock/omap: add support for dt nodes
On Wed, Jul 2, 2014 at 10:42 PM, Suman Anna <s-anna@...com> wrote:
> Yeah, I did this since we only had 1 instance, and used the same value
> as used in the non-DT legacy code. Once I fold back Patch 8 that adds
> the hwlock-base-id property, this will be assigned by reading that property.
Sounds good, thanks!
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists