linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 0/4] Add reset controllers for STiH407 SoC

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Thu, 3 Jul 2014 10:40:01 +0100
From:	Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>
To:	Philipp Zabel <p.zabel@...gutronix.de>
Cc:	Maxime Coquelin <maxime.coquelin@...com>,
	Peter Griffin <peter.griffin@...aro.org>,
	linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	srinivas.kandagatla@...il.com, patrice.chotard@...com,
	devicetree@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/4] Add reset controllers for STiH407 SoC

On Thu, 03 Jul 2014, Philipp Zabel wrote:
> Am Donnerstag, den 03.07.2014, 10:06 +0200 schrieb Maxime Coquelin:
> > I will queue patch 4 to STi DT branch for v3.17.
> > For now, no nodes uses reset for STiH407, so we don't need the 
> > dt-bindings header file in the STi tree.
> > 
> > If we have a DT node using a reset line before my pull-request, I might 
> > have to integrate the series in the STi DT branch.
> > Philipp, does that sound reasonable?
> 
> Patch 4 depends on patch 1 for the header. My tree is still empty, how
> about I take the first two, and you merge that branch and then take 3
> and 4 on top?

That approach sounds reasonable.  Once you've applied the patches can
you tag the branch and provide Maxime with a pull-request please
Philipp?

-- 
Lee Jones
Linaro STMicroelectronics Landing Team Lead
Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs
Follow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/