[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20140703095135.GA21776@pd.tnic>
Date: Thu, 3 Jul 2014 11:51:35 +0200
From: Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
To: Yasuaki Ishimatsu <isimatu.yasuaki@...fujitsu.com>
Cc: tglx@...utronix.de, mingo@...hat.com, hpa@...or.com,
x86@...nel.org, toshi.kani@...com, imammedo@...hat.com,
huawei.libin@...wei.com, paul.gortmaker@...driver.com,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, srivatsa.bhat@...ux.vnet.ibm.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86,cpu-hotplug: clear llc_shared_mask at CPU hotplug
On Thu, Jul 03, 2014 at 01:52:52PM +0900, Yasuaki Ishimatsu wrote:
> I think that the reason to apply CPU number to ACPI ID is that CPU is
> used for the application without considering physical CPU. So even if
> CPU number is changed, it is no matter.
I don't think I understand what you're saying here...
> Thus the readded cores is numbered to unused CPU number.
Well, maybe we should use some method to number cores in a stable manner
so that they don't get new numbers when they reappear.
> I think the mask has 2 meanings as follows:
> - representing CPUs that share same CPU cache.
... that share the last level cache.
> - representing onlined CPUs
no, for that we have cpu_online_mask.
> So even if we keep their old numbers, we should clear the mask when
> offlinig CPU.
No, cpu_online_mask is for onlined cores. I think the mask which shows
which cores share a last level cache should not be changed *IF* the core
numbers remain stable, that is.
--
Regards/Gruss,
Boris.
Sent from a fat crate under my desk. Formatting is fine.
--
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists