linux-kernel - [PATCH 3.11 105/198] idr: fix overflow bug during maximum ID calculation at maximum height

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <1404379241-8590-106-git-send-email-luis.henriques@canonical.com>
Date:	Thu,  3 Jul 2014 10:19:08 +0100
From:	Luis Henriques <luis.henriques@...onical.com>
To:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, stable@...r.kernel.org,
	kernel-team@...ts.ubuntu.com
Cc:	Lai Jiangshan <laijs@...fujitsu.com>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Luis Henriques <luis.henriques@...onical.com>
Subject: [PATCH 3.11 105/198] idr: fix overflow bug during maximum ID calculation at maximum height

3.11.10.13 -stable review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

------------------

From: Lai Jiangshan <laijs@...fujitsu.com>

commit 3afb69cb5572b3c8c898c00880803cf1a49852c4 upstream.

idr_replace() open-codes the logic to calculate the maximum valid ID
given the height of the idr tree; unfortunately, the open-coded logic
doesn't account for the fact that the top layer may have unused slots
and over-shifts the limit to zero when the tree is at its maximum
height.

The following test code shows it fails to replace the value for
id=((1<<27)+42):

  static void test5(void)
  {
        int id;
        DEFINE_IDR(test_idr);
  #define TEST5_START ((1<<27)+42) /* use the highest layer */

        printk(KERN_INFO "Start test5\n");
        id = idr_alloc(&test_idr, (void *)1, TEST5_START, 0, GFP_KERNEL);
        BUG_ON(id != TEST5_START);
        TEST_BUG_ON(idr_replace(&test_idr, (void *)2, TEST5_START) != (void *)1);
        idr_destroy(&test_idr);
        printk(KERN_INFO "End of test5\n");
  }

Fix the bug by using idr_max() which correctly takes into account the
maximum allowed shift.

sub_alloc() shares the same problem and may incorrectly fail with
-EAGAIN; however, this bug doesn't affect correct operation because
idr_get_empty_slot(), which already uses idr_max(), retries with the
increased @id in such cases.

[tj@...nel.org: Updated patch description.]
Signed-off-by: Lai Jiangshan <laijs@...fujitsu.com>
Acked-by: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Luis Henriques <luis.henriques@...onical.com>
---
 lib/idr.c | 8 +++-----
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)

diff --git a/lib/idr.c b/lib/idr.c
index bfe4db4e165f..674c30bc2ed0 100644
--- a/lib/idr.c
+++ b/lib/idr.c
@@ -250,7 +250,7 @@ static int sub_alloc(struct idr *idp, int *starting_id, struct idr_layer **pa,
 			id = (id | ((1 << (IDR_BITS * l)) - 1)) + 1;
 
 			/* if already at the top layer, we need to grow */
-			if (id >= 1 << (idp->layers * IDR_BITS)) {
+			if (id > idr_max(idp->layers)) {
 				*starting_id = id;
 				return -EAGAIN;
 			}
@@ -827,12 +827,10 @@ void *idr_replace(struct idr *idp, void *ptr, int id)
 	if (!p)
 		return ERR_PTR(-EINVAL);
 
-	n = (p->layer+1) * IDR_BITS;
-
-	if (id >= (1 << n))
+	if (id > idr_max(p->layer + 1))
 		return ERR_PTR(-EINVAL);
 
-	n -= IDR_BITS;
+	n = p->layer * IDR_BITS;
 	while ((n > 0) && p) {
 		p = p->ary[(id >> n) & IDR_MASK];
 		n -= IDR_BITS;
-- 
1.9.1

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/