lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Wed, 02 Jul 2014 18:42:53 -0700
From:	Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...radead.org>
To:	Kees Cook <kees@...flux.net>
CC:	akpm@...ux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-next@...r.kernel.org, sfr@...b.auug.org.au, mhocko@...e.cz,
	Andi Kleen <ak@...ux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: mmotm 2014-07-02-15-07 uploaded (stack protector)

On 07/02/14 17:57, Kees Cook wrote:
> Hi Randy,
> 
> And to explain more specifically what's happening:
> 
> On Wed, Jul 02, 2014 at 04:21:06PM -0700, Randy Dunlap wrote:
>> config-r8736:CONFIG_CC_STACKPROTECTOR_STRONG=y
>> [...]
>> build-r8736.out:/local/lnx/MM/mmotm-2014-0702-1507/Makefile:662: Cannot use CONFIG_CC_STACKPROTECTOR_STRONG: -fstack-protector-strong not supported by compiler
>> build-r8736.out:/local/lnx/MM/mmotm-2014-0702-1507/Makefile:662: Cannot use CONFIG_CC_STACKPROTECTOR_STRONG: -fstack-protector-strong not supported by compiler
>> gcc: error: unrecognized command line option '-fstack-protector-strong'
> 
> That makes sense: a feature that requires a specific compiler version was
> chosen, so you get a warning and a failed build. (The first warning was
> during the .config parsing pass, the second warning was during the binary
> build pass.)
> 
>> config-r8737:# CONFIG_CC_STACKPROTECTOR_STRONG is not set
>> [...]
>> build-r8737.out:/local/lnx/MM/mmotm-2014-0702-1507/Makefile:662: Cannot use CONFIG_CC_STACKPROTECTOR_STRONG: -fstack-protector-strong not supported by compiler
> 
> This is the same issue: the prior .config was still there with STRONG set,
> but after finishing the new .config parsing pass, everything is happy for
> the binary build pass. And, I assume, the r8737 didn't fail to build.

True, r8737 built successfully.

Maybe I should use 'make mrproper' instead of 'make clean' between each randconfig
build.

Thanks.

> 
> The trouble seems to be how kbuild handle .config changes, but I was never
> able to sort it out.


-- 
~Randy
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ